Long-term autonomous time-keeping of navigation constellations based on sparse sampling LSTM algorithm

The system time of the four major navigation satellite systems is mainly maintained by multiple high-performance atomic clocks at ground stations. This operational mode relies heavily on the support of ground stations. To enhance the high-precision autonomous timing capability of next-generation nav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Satellite Navigation 2024-12, Vol.5 (1), p.15-14, Article 15
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Shitao, Yi, Xiao, Dong, Richang, Wu, Yifan, Shuai, Tao, Zhang, Jun, Ren, Qianyi, Gong, Wenbin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The system time of the four major navigation satellite systems is mainly maintained by multiple high-performance atomic clocks at ground stations. This operational mode relies heavily on the support of ground stations. To enhance the high-precision autonomous timing capability of next-generation navigation satellites, it is necessary to autonomously generate a comprehensive space-based time scale on orbit and make long-term, high-precision predictions for the clock error of this time scale. In order to solve these two problems, this paper proposed a two-level satellite timing system, and used multiple time-keeping node satellites to generate a more stable space-based time scale. Then this paper used the sparse sampling Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm to improve the accuracy of clock error long-term prediction on space-based time scale. After simulation, at sampling times of 300 s, 8.64 × 10 4  s, and 1 × 10 6  s, the frequency stabilities of the spaceborne timescale reach 1.35 × 10 –15 , 3.37 × 10 –16 , and 2.81 × 10 –16 , respectively. When applying the improved clock error prediction algorithm, the ten-day prediction error is 3.16 × 10 –10  s. Compared with those of the continuous sampling LSTM, Kalman filter, polynomial and quadratic polynomial models, the corresponding prediction accuracies are 1.72, 1.56, 1.83 and 1.36 times greater, respectively.
ISSN:2662-9291
2662-1363
DOI:10.1186/s43020-024-00137-6