The value of dual-energy spectral CT in differentiating solitary pulmonary tuberculosis and solitary lung adenocarcinoma

To explore the value of dual-energy spectral CT in distinguishing solitary pulmonary tuberculosis (SP-TB) from solitary lung adenocarcinoma (S-LUAD). A total of 246 patients confirmed SP-TB (n = 86) or S-LUAD (n = 160) were retrospectively included. Spectral CT parameters include CT value, CT value,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in oncology 2022-11, Vol.12, p.1000028-1000028
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Guojin, Li, Shenglin, Yang, Ke, Shang, Lan, Zhang, Feng, Huang, Zixin, Ren, Jialiang, Zhang, Zhuoli, Zhou, Junlin, Pu, Hong, Man, Qiong, Kong, Weifang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To explore the value of dual-energy spectral CT in distinguishing solitary pulmonary tuberculosis (SP-TB) from solitary lung adenocarcinoma (S-LUAD). A total of 246 patients confirmed SP-TB (n = 86) or S-LUAD (n = 160) were retrospectively included. Spectral CT parameters include CT value, CT value, iodine concentration (IC), water concentration (WC), effective atomic number (Zeff), and spectral curve slope (λ ). Data were measured during the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP). Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables, and a two-sample -test was used to compare spectral CT parameters. ROC curves were used to calculate diagnostic efficiency. There were significant differences in spectral CT quantitative parameters (including CT value [all 0.001] , CT value [all 0.001], λ [ 0.001, and = 0.027], Zeff [ 0.015, and = 0.001], and IC [ 0.002, and = 0.028]) between the two groups during the AP and VP. However, WC ( 0.930, and = 0.823) was not statistically different between the two groups. The ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC in the AP and VP was 90.9% (95% CI, 0.873-0.945) and 83.4% (95% CI, 0.780-0.887), respectively. The highest diagnostic performance (AUC, 97.6%; 95% CI, 0.961-0.991) was achieved when all spectral CT parameters were combined with clinical variables. Dual-energy spectral CT has a significant value in distinguishing SP-TB from S-LUAD.
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.1000028