Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

The purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon Acrysof IQ PanOptix TNFT00 (group A), and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus lens, J&J Tecnis Symfony ZXR00...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2017-01, Vol.11, p.1911-1916
Hauptverfasser: de Medeiros, André Lins, de Araújo Rolim, André Gustavo, Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta, Ventura, Bruna Vieira, Vilar, César, Chaves, Mário Augusto Pereira Dias, Carricondo, Pedro Carlos, Hida, Wilson Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon Acrysof IQ PanOptix TNFT00 (group A), and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus lens, J&J Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis ZMB00 (group B). This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive, comparative study included the assessment of 40 eyes in 20 patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lens. Exclusion criteria were existence of any corneal, retina, or optic nerve disease, previous eye surgery, illiteracy, previous refractive surgery, high axial myopia, expected postoperative corneal astigmatism of >1.00 cylindrical diopter (D), and intraoperative or postoperative complications. Binocular visual acuity was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), with the analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual defocus curve. Postoperative UDVA was 0.01 and -0.096 logMAR (
ISSN:1177-5467
1177-5483
1177-5483
DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S145945