Quality control of cannabis inflorescence and oil products: Response factors for the cost-efficient determination of ten cannabinoids by HPLC

•Relative response factors are valid for the HPLC-PDA analysis of ten cannabinoids.•Quantification was achieved without costly standards, only requiring CBD and CBDA.•Surrogate matrices were valid for determining the method accuracy by spike-recovery. The quality control of medicinal cannabis should include quantification of as many cannabinoids as practicable in a routine analytical lab, to accurately reflect the quality of the product. However, the cost and availability of some cannabinoid standards is an impediment to their routine use. This work seeks to overcome this obstacle by analysing samples using relative retention times (RRT) and relative response factors (RRF), relative to CBD and CBDA reference standards which are readily available. A high-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array method was developed to quantify ten cannabinoids (Δ9-THC, Δ8-THC, THCA-A, CBN, CBD, CDBA, CBC, CBDV, CBG, and CBGA) in dried cannabis inflorescence and cannabis oil. This method was validated according to ICH guidelines. The proposed method has detection limits ranging from 20 to 78 µg/g, which provided sufficient sensitivity for the panel of cannabinoids. Non-cannabinoid surrogate matrices were used for spike recovery studies to determine method accuracy – analyte recoveries for the inflorescence and oil ranged from 90.1 to 109.3% (inflorescence mean, 100.9%; oil mean, 99.6%). The RRT and RRF values determined independently by three analysts were comparable, indicating the method is robust. The validity of analysis using RRT and RRF was further confirmed by testing six inflorescence samples, as it was found that concentrations above the order of magnitude of the LoQ agreed satisfactorily (range, 95.0 to 111.9%; mean, 100.0%) with the concentrations obtained through the conventional approach of multipoint calibration using pure standards. The proposed method is therefore suitable for the rapid and simple determination of a panel of ten cannabinoids without having to repeatedly purchase every expensive pure standard. Accordingly, analysts in the medicinal cannabis field may explore the use of RRF and RRT for their methods and instruments. [Display omitted]