ADRC Control of Ultra-High-Speed Electric Air Compressor Considering Excitation Observation

With the increasing power of fuel cells, ultra-high-speed electric air compressors (UHSEACs) have been widely used. However, due to the ultra-high speeds involved, UHSEACs face problems such as long speed adjustment times and large speed fluctuations. Compared to other control methods, Active Distur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Actuators 2024-10, Vol.13 (10), p.420
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Jiaming, Li, Yingzheng, Zhang, Jinming, Yi, Fengyan, Feng, Chunxiao, Zhang, Caizhi, Deng, Bo, Qi, Honglei, Wang, Yu, Wang, Shuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With the increasing power of fuel cells, ultra-high-speed electric air compressors (UHSEACs) have been widely used. However, due to the ultra-high speeds involved, UHSEACs face problems such as long speed adjustment times and large speed fluctuations. Compared to other control methods, Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) is well-suited for highly nonlinear systems like UHSEACs. The Extended State Observer (ESO), a key component of the ADRC, struggles to accurately observe high-frequency excitations. To address this, the first step is to add a cascaded structure to the ESO and design a Current State Extended State Observer (CS-ESO) to better observe the electromagnetic and load excitations in the UHSEAC. The second step involves designing the ADRC based on the CS-ESO and performing speed adjustment simulations. The third step is to build a UHSEAC experimental platform and a conduct speed adjustment experiment. The findings indicate that, compared to the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control, the ADRC with the ESO, and the Sliding Mode Control (SMC), the use of the ADRC with the CS-ESO results in a significant reduction in overshoot—by at least 760 RPM under load-increasing conditions and 140 RPM under load-reducing conditions. Furthermore, the speed regulation time is notably decreased by at least 0.2 s and 0.1 s under these respective conditions.
ISSN:2076-0825
2076-0825
DOI:10.3390/act13100420