A social consensus to prioritize humanization strategies for Mental Health in Castilla y León

IntroductionHumanization in Mental Health is a concept that treat to conceal in the last decades the quality, efficiency and safety of care of complex diseases and conditions with individual values, needs and preferences and involves the patient and society in the decision-making priority.Objectivesto stablish and evaluate the priorities of different groups of interest in the development of a new humanization plan for mental healthMethodsDuring 2022 a Humanization plan for the Spanish region of Castilla y Leon (2.400.000 habs) was developed with a Delphi model. Participants included 36 stakeholders including mental health services, administration, social services, associations, patients and families. They stablished 32 objectives distributed in 7 strategic lines: 1. “People First” (Rights, Autonomy and Information); 2. “From People to Services” (Participation of users in mental heal services); 3. “Person-Centered-Assistance” 4. “Processes sensible to change” (reduction of coercion); 5. “Human ambient” (Improvement of units, psychosocial interventions). 6. Innovation, training and climate (not evaluated here). 7. “People without marks” (battle against stigma).Priorities in the lines were stablished by representatives from mental health and other healthcare professionals, social and educational stakeholders, scientific societies, patients and families. After agreeing to participate in the process, they had to answer an online survey. For each line, they have to score it from 0 to 10.Results500 subjects participated (38.6% Healthcare workers, 14% Mental Health Care users, 9.8% Social Services, 8.8% Associations, 7.8% Drug Services 6% Management of Health System, 5.8% Education Services, 3.8 Justice). Humanization was the most appreciated plan within the mental health plan 2022-2026 in Castilla y Leon (8.81±1.43).The Highest priority score was given to the Rights (8.68 + 1.54), Information (8.44 + 1.60) and Stigma (8.43 + 1.89) lines and the lowest were the evaluation of satisfaction (7.62 + 1.90) and Reduction of Coercion (7.29 + 2.12). Differences were found between groups. Scores in Rights and Autonomy (F:3.474; p