Associations between vision impairment and vision-related interventions on crash risk and driving cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis

To systematically investigate the associations between vision impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash (MVC) involvement, and evaluate vision-related interventions to reduce MVCs. Medline (Ovid), EMBASE and Global Health electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to March 202...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2023-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e065210-e065210
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Helen, Di Tanna, Gian Luca, Coxon, Kristy, Brown, Julie, Ren, Kerrie, Ramke, Jacqueline, Burton, Matthew J, Gordon, Iris, Zhang, Justine H, Furtado, João, Mdala, Shaffi, Kitema, Gatera Fiston, Keay, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To systematically investigate the associations between vision impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash (MVC) involvement, and evaluate vision-related interventions to reduce MVCs. Medline (Ovid), EMBASE and Global Health electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2022 for observational and interventional English-language studies. Screening, data extraction and appraisals using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools were completed by two reviewers independently. Where appropriate, measures of association were converted into risk ratios (RRs) or ORs for meta-analysis. Drivers of four-wheeled vehicles of all ages with no cognitive declines. MVC involvement (primary) and driving cessation (secondary). 101 studies (n=778 052) were included after full-text review. 57 studies only involved older drivers (≥65 years) and 85 were in high-income settings. Heterogeneity in the data meant that most meta-analyses were underpowered as only 25 studies, further split into different groups of eye diseases and measures of vision, could be meta-analysed. The limited evidence from the meta-analyses suggests that visual field defects (four studies; RR 1.51 (95% CI 1.23, 1.85); p
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065210