Establishment and validation of reference intervals for tumor markers (AFP, CEA, CA19‐9, CA15‐3, CA125, PSA, HE4, Cyfra 21‐1, and ProGRP) in primary care centers in Korea: A cross‐sectional retrospective study

Background and Aims The reference interval (RI) for a tumor marker may vary between populations, detection systems, and the methods used to obtain their values. The aims of this study were to establish age‐ and sex‐specific RIs for the following nine common tumor markers and to validate the establis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health science reports 2023-02, Vol.6 (2), p.e1107-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Nah, Eun‐Hee, Cho, Seon, Park, Hyeran, Kim, Suyoung, Kwon, Eunjoo, Cho, Han‐Ik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims The reference interval (RI) for a tumor marker may vary between populations, detection systems, and the methods used to obtain their values. The aims of this study were to establish age‐ and sex‐specific RIs for the following nine common tumor markers and to validate the established RIs in Korean adults: alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA) 19‐9, CA15‐3, CA125, Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), total prostate specific antigen, cytokeratin fragment (Cyfra) 21‐1, and progastrin‐releasing peptide (ProGRP). Methods This cross‐sectional study consecutively selected 214,159 individuals (aged 18–98 years) who underwent health checkups at 16 health‐promotion centers in 13 Korean cities. Finally, 62,752 examinees were used to establish the RIs after removing outliers. RIs were established using an indirect method according to the CLSI EP28‐A3C guideline. The established RIs were validated by calculating the proportion of individuals outside each RI. Results Sex‐related differences were observed for AFP, CEA, CA19‐9, Cyfra 21‐1, and ProGRP (p 
ISSN:2398-8835
2398-8835
DOI:10.1002/hsr2.1107