Randomized controlled trial: neostigmine for intra-abdominal hypertension in acute pancreatitis

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with deterioration in organ function. This trial aimed to assess the efficacy of neostigmine for IAH in patients with AP. In this single-center, randomized trial, consenting patients with IAH within 2 weeks of AP onset recei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2022-03, Vol.26 (1), p.52-52, Article 52
Hauptverfasser: He, Wenhua, Chen, Peng, Lei, Yupeng, Xia, Liang, Liu, Pi, Zhu, Yong, Zeng, Hao, Wu, Yao, Ke, Huajing, Huang, Xin, Cai, Wenhao, Sun, Xin, Huang, Wei, Sutton, Robert, Zhu, Yin, Lu, Nonghua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with deterioration in organ function. This trial aimed to assess the efficacy of neostigmine for IAH in patients with AP. In this single-center, randomized trial, consenting patients with IAH within 2 weeks of AP onset received conventional treatment for 24 h. Patients with sustained intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) ≥ 12 mmHg were randomized to receive intramuscular neostigmine (1 mg every 12 h increased to every 8 h or every 6 h, depending on response) or continue conventional treatment for 7 days. The primary outcome was the percent change of IAP at 24 h after randomization. A total of 80 patients were recruited to neostigmine (n = 40) or conventional treatment (n = 40). There was no significant difference in baseline parameters. The rate of decrease in IAP was significantly faster in the neostigmine group compared to the conventional group by 24 h (median with 25th-75th percentile: -18.7% [- 28.4 to - 4.7%] vs. - 5.4% [- 18.0% to 0], P = 0.017). This effect was more pronounced in patients with baseline IAP ≥ 15 mmHg (P = 0.018). Per-protocol analysis confirmed these results (P = 0.03). Stool volume was consistently higher in the neostigmine group during the 7-day observational period (all P 
ISSN:1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
DOI:10.1186/s13054-022-03922-4