Impacts of glycemic variability on the relationship between glucose management indicator from iPro2 and laboratory hemoglobin A1c in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Aims: Our aim was to investigate the impact of glycemic variability (GV) on the relationship between glucose management indicator (GMI) and laboratory glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods: Adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) were enrolled from five hospitals in China. All subjects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism 2020-06, Vol.11
Hauptverfasser: Hongxia Liu, Daizhi Yang, Hongrong Deng, Wen Xu, Jing Lv, Yongwen Zhou, Sihui Luo, Xueying Zheng, Hua Liang, Bin Yao, Liling Qiu, Funeng Wang, Fang Liu, Jinhua Yan, Jianping Weng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims: Our aim was to investigate the impact of glycemic variability (GV) on the relationship between glucose management indicator (GMI) and laboratory glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods: Adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) were enrolled from five hospitals in China. All subjects wore the iPro ™ 2 system for 14 days before HbA1c was measured at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Data derived from iPro ™ 2 sensor was used to calculate GMI and GV parameters [standard deviation (SD), glucose coefficient of variation (CV), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)]. Differences between GMI and laboratory HbA1c were assessed by the absolute value of the hemoglobin glycation index (HGI). Results: A total of 91 sensor data and corresponding laboratory HbA1c, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed. GMI and HbA1c were 7.20 ± 0.67% and 7.52 ± 0.73%, respectively. The percentage of subjects with absolute HGI 0 to lower than 0.1% was 21%. GMI was significantly associated with laboratory HbA1c after basic adjustment (standardized β = 0.83, p  
ISSN:2042-0196
DOI:10.1177/2042018820931664