Comparison of the prognostic impact of IPI and PIT in peripheral T-cell lymphoma in real-world practice with a large elderly population

We compared the predictive ability of the International Prognostic Index (IPI), a frequently used prognostic model for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), with that of a type-specific prognostic model, the Prognostic Index for PTCL-U (PIT). We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients diagnosed with PTCL...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2023-11, Vol.13 (1), p.19060-19060, Article 19060
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Nobuhiko, Kanemura, Nobuhiro, Matsumoto, Takuro, Nakamura, Hiroshi, Ikoma, Yoshikazu, Shibata, Yuhei, Kitagawa, Junnichi, Kasahara, Senji, Yamada, Toshiki, Sawada, Michio, Kaneda, Yuto, Fukuno, Kenji, Takada, Eri, Goto, Hideko, Lee, Shin, Fujita, Kei, Morishita, Tetsuji, Hara, Takeshi, Tsurumi, Hisashi, Shimizu, Masahito
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We compared the predictive ability of the International Prognostic Index (IPI), a frequently used prognostic model for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), with that of a type-specific prognostic model, the Prognostic Index for PTCL-U (PIT). We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients diagnosed with PTCL. The median age was 67 years (range, 16–88 years), 75 patients (66%) were male, and the most common disease type was PTCL, not otherwise specified (69%). With a median follow-up of 6.8 years (interquartile range, 2.7–9.9 years), 5-year survival rates for the four groups in IPI were 85%, 62%, 49%, and 13%, respectively. Similarly, 5-year survival rates for the four groups in PIT were 83%, 64%, 49%, and 19%, respectively. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve for predicting mortality from PIT (0.725) was not significantly different from that from the IPI (0.685, P  = 0.134). Multivariable analysis showed that performance status ≥ 2 ( P  
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-46501-5