Aircraft-engine particulate matter emissions from conventional and sustainable aviation fuel combustion: comparison of measurement techniques for mass, number, and size

Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) have different compositions compared to conventional petroleum jet fuels, particularly in terms of fuel sulfur and hydrocarbon content. These differences may change the amount and physicochemical properties of volatile and non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) emit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric measurement techniques 2022-05, Vol.15 (10), p.3223-3242
Hauptverfasser: Corbin, Joel C, Schripp, Tobias, Anderson, Bruce E, Smallwood, Greg J, LeClercq, Patrick, Crosbie, Ewan C, Achterberg, Steven, Whitefield, Philip D, Miake-Lye, Richard C, Yu, Zhenhong, Freedman, Andrew, Trueblood, Max, Satterfield, David, Liu, Wenyan, Oßwald, Patrick, Robinson, Claire, Shook, Michael A, Moore, Richard H, Lobo, Prem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) have different compositions compared to conventional petroleum jet fuels, particularly in terms of fuel sulfur and hydrocarbon content. These differences may change the amount and physicochemical properties of volatile and non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) emitted by aircraft engines. In this study, we evaluate whether comparable nvPM measurement techniques respond similarly to nvPM produced by three blends of SAFs compared to three conventional fuels. Multiple SAF blends and conventional (Jet A-1) jet fuels were combusted in a V2527-A5 engine, while an additional conventional fuel (JP-8) was combusted in a CFM56-2C1 engine.
ISSN:1867-8548
1867-1381
1867-8548
DOI:10.5194/amt-15-3223-2022