Postoperative recovery patterns following discectomy surgery in patients with lumbar radiculopathy

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data aimed to identify unique pain and disability trajectories in patients following lumbar discectomy surgery. Patients of this study population presented chiefly with lumbar radiculopathy and underwent discectomy surgery from thirteen sites enrol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2022-07, Vol.12 (1), p.11146-11146, Article 11146
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Shuaijin, Hebert, Jeffrey J., Abraham, Edward, Vandewint, Amanda, Bigney, Erin, Richardson, Eden, El-Mughayyar, Dana, Attabib, Najmedden, Wedderkopp, Niels, Kingwell, Stephen, Soroceanu, Alex, Weber, M. H., Hall, Hamilton, Finkelstein, Joel, Bailey, Christopher S., Thomas, Kenneth, Nataraj, Andrew, Paquet, Jerome, Johnson, Michael G., Fisher, Charles, Rampersaud, Y. Raja, Dea, Nicolas, Small, Chris, Manson, Neil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This retrospective study of prospectively collected data aimed to identify unique pain and disability trajectories in patients following lumbar discectomy surgery. Patients of this study population presented chiefly with lumbar radiculopathy and underwent discectomy surgery from thirteen sites enrolled in the CSORN registry. Outcome variables of interest included numeric rating scales for leg/back pain and modified Oswestry disability index scores at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Latent class growth analysis was used to identify distinct courses in each outcome. Data from 524 patients revealed three unique trajectories for leg pain (excellent = 18.4%, good = 55.4%, poor = 26.3%), disability (excellent = 59.7%, fair = 35.6%, poor = 4.7%) and back pain (excellent = 13.0%, good = 56.4%, poor = 30.6%). Construct validity was supported by statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients attaining the criteria for minimal important change (MIC; 30%) or clinical success in disability (50% or Oswestry score ≤ 22) (p 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-15169-8