Urinary tract infection and Diabetes Mellitus-Etio-clinical profile and antibiogram: A North Indian perspective

Context: A complex dysregulation of glucose homeostasis, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an iceberg disease with an ever-rising global (8.5%, 2018) and national prevalence (7.3% - ICMR-INDIAB study, 2017) amidst adults. Besides the micro and macrovascular complications, in virtue of diverse mechanisms tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of family medicine and primary care 2022-05, Vol.11 (5), p.1902-1906
Hauptverfasser: Jagadeesan, Subramani, Tripathi, Brijendra, Patel, Pranav, Muthathal, Subramanian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Context: A complex dysregulation of glucose homeostasis, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an iceberg disease with an ever-rising global (8.5%, 2018) and national prevalence (7.3% - ICMR-INDIAB study, 2017) amidst adults. Besides the micro and macrovascular complications, in virtue of diverse mechanisms that downplay the immune system culminating in an array of infections especially UTIs are commoner in routine diabetic clinics. The spectrum of UTI ranges from asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) to serious complications such as emphysematous pyelonephritis, renal abscesses that are encountered frequently among Diabetics than the general population. The risk stratification and varying modalities of presentation of UTIs in diabetics in contrast with non-diabetics are being studied. Methods and Material: A prospective comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in 250 adult consenting participants with equal diabetics and non-diabetics with culture-proven UTI, at the Department of Internal Medicine in a tertiary care hospital of National Capital Territory (NCT) of India, after fulfilling appropriate criteria. Alongside socio-demographic details and vitals parameters, glycaemic status assessment and relevant investigations were done in either group. Results: Mean age of the participants was 52.18 ± 9.06 with age and gender being reasonably distributed in both the groups. Fever (P
ISSN:2249-4863
2278-7135
DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2017_21