Assessment of validity and comparison of two Spanish versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale

The Geriatric Depression Scale is an instrument used to identify depression in people of an older age. The original English version of this scale has been translated into Spanish (GDS- ); two shorter versions of 5- (GDS-5) and 15-items (GDS-15) have been developed. To assess the validity and compare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychology 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1101886
Hauptverfasser: Bugallo-Carrera, Cesar, Dosil-Díaz, Carlos, Pereiro, Arturo X, Anido-Rifón, Luís, Pacheco-Lorenzo, Moisés, Fernández-Iglesias, Manuel J, Gandoy-Crego, Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Geriatric Depression Scale is an instrument used to identify depression in people of an older age. The original English version of this scale has been translated into Spanish (GDS- ); two shorter versions of 5- (GDS-5) and 15-items (GDS-15) have been developed. To assess the validity and compare the 5- and 15-item Spanish versions of the GDS among the Spanish population. 573 Galicia residents aged >50 years participated in this study. The following instruments were applied: the 19-item Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization and Pleasure scale, the Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire, the Mini-Mental State Examination test, the GDS-5, and the GDS-15. We found differences in total score between GDS-5 and GDS-15 regarding the variable sex. Internal reliability for GDS-5 and GDS-15 was 0.495 and 0.715, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for GDS-5 - with a cut-off value of 1 - was 0.517 and 0.650, respectively; for GDS-15 - with a cut-off value of 3 points - sensitivity was 0.755 and specificity 0.668. GDS-5 has a ROC curve of 0.617 and GDS-15 of 0.764. GDS-15, and to a greater extent GDS-5, should be revised or even reformulated to improve their diagnostic usefulness by choosing higher discriminative ability items or even include new items with greater sensitivity that consider currently prevailing psychosocial factors.
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101886