Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

[4], with 138 patients, compared two crossed K-wire techniques and not crossed K-wires with diverging lateral K-wires as all other included studies. [...]the 2 former studies should have been excluded, limiting the meta-analysis to 10 studies with 743 patients. [...]considering that Zhao et at [1] r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2022-08, Vol.17 (1), p.1-394, Article 394
Hauptverfasser: Rehm, Andreas, Ashby, Elizabeth, Granger, Luke, Ong, Joshua C. Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[4], with 138 patients, compared two crossed K-wire techniques and not crossed K-wires with diverging lateral K-wires as all other included studies. [...]the 2 former studies should have been excluded, limiting the meta-analysis to 10 studies with 743 patients. [...]considering that Zhao et at [1] reported that the quality of the included studies was generally poor, the fact that Skaggs et al. Range of movement Zhao H, Xu S, Liu G, Zhao J, Wu S, Peng L. Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
ISSN:1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-022-03286-z