Cross-species experiments reveal widespread cochlear neural damage in normal hearing

Animal models suggest that cochlear afferent nerve endings may be more vulnerable than sensory hair cells to damage from acoustic overexposure and aging. Because neural degeneration without hair-cell loss cannot be detected in standard clinical audiometry, whether such damage occurs in humans is hot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communications biology 2022-07, Vol.5 (1), p.733-733, Article 733
Hauptverfasser: Bharadwaj, Hari M., Hustedt-Mai, Alexandra R., Ginsberg, Hannah M., Dougherty, Kelsey M., Muthaiah, Vijaya Prakash Krishnan, Hagedorn, Anna, Simpson, Jennifer M., Heinz, Michael G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Animal models suggest that cochlear afferent nerve endings may be more vulnerable than sensory hair cells to damage from acoustic overexposure and aging. Because neural degeneration without hair-cell loss cannot be detected in standard clinical audiometry, whether such damage occurs in humans is hotly debated. Here, we address this debate through co-ordinated experiments in at-risk humans and a wild-type chinchilla model. Cochlear neuropathy leads to large and sustained reductions of the wideband middle-ear muscle reflex in chinchillas. Analogously, human wideband reflex measures revealed distinct damage patterns in middle age, and in young individuals with histories of high acoustic exposure. Analysis of an independent large public dataset and additional measurements using clinical equipment corroborated the patterns revealed by our targeted cross-species experiments. Taken together, our results suggest that cochlear neural damage is widespread even in populations with clinically normal hearing. Cross-species experiments on chinchillas and at-risk humans suggest cochlear synaptopathy from noise exposure and aging are widespread even among individuals with clinically normal hearing status.
ISSN:2399-3642
2399-3642
DOI:10.1038/s42003-022-03691-4