Oncology safety of proximal gastrectomy for advanced Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction compared with total gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

The safety of proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the treatment of advanced Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains debatable. In this study, we aim to evaluate the oncological safety of PG and the metastasis rate of key distal lymph node dissection, which is typically excl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgical oncology 2024-11, Vol.22 (1), p.311-11, Article 311
Hauptverfasser: Song, Qiying, Wu, Di, Liu, Shihe, Xu, Ziyao, Lu, Yixun, Wang, Xinxin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The safety of proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the treatment of advanced Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains debatable. In this study, we aim to evaluate the oncological safety of PG and the metastasis rate of key distal lymph node dissection, which is typically excluded in PG. This study retrospective collected advanced Siewert II AEG patients who underwent gastrectomy at the First Medical Center of the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) from January 2014 to December 2019. A total of 421 patients were enrolled, including 237 PG and 184 total gastrectomy (TG). Propensity score matching (PSM) in a 1:1 ratio was performed to reduce the influence of confounding variables. After PSM, 153 cases were matched in each group. The TG group had longer operation time, more lymph node detection and longer postoperative hospitalization time than the PG group (Both P  0.05). For long-term complications, the incidence of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stenosis were significantly higher in the PG group than in the TG group (Both P 
ISSN:1477-7819
1477-7819
DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03592-2