Prospective validation of VEGF and eNOS polymorphisms as predictors of first-line bevacizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy is a standard first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), however to date no predictive factors of response have been identified. Results of our previous analysis on patients enrolled in a randomized prospective phase III multicenter study (ITACa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2023-08, Vol.13 (1), p.12921-12921, Article 12921
Hauptverfasser: Marisi, Giorgia, Azzali, Irene, Passardi, Alessandro, Rebuzzi, Francesca, Bartolini, Giulia, Urbini, Milena, Canale, Matteo, Molinari, Chiara, Matteucci, Laura, Sullo, Francesco Giulio, Debonis, Silvia Angela, Gallio, Chiara, Gallo, Graziana, Frassineti, Giovanni Luca, Ulivi, Paola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy is a standard first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), however to date no predictive factors of response have been identified. Results of our previous analysis on patients enrolled in a randomized prospective phase III multicenter study (ITACa study) showed a predictive value of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ( VEGF ) polymorphism ( VEGF  + 936), a 27-nucleotide variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase ( eNOS ) gene and eNOS  + 894 polymorphism. mCRC patients, treated with Bev plus chemotherapy, were included in this prospective validation trial. eNOS  + 894G > T was analyzed by Real time PCR, while the eNOS VNTR and VEGF  + 936C > T were determined by standard PCR and direct sequencing analysis. These polymorphisms were assessed in relation to progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). These three polymorphisms were not predictive of PFS ( p 0.91, 0.59 and 0.09, respectively), and OS ( p 0.95, 0.32 and 0.46, respectively). Moreover, the haplotype analyses did not confirm what was found in our previous study; patients bearing a specific haplotype of eNOS had not significantly improved outcomes. This prospective study failed to validate the predictive impact of eNOS and VEGF polymorphisms for response to Bev plus first-line chemotherapy in mCRC patients.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-40220-7