Designing an App for Immunosuppression Adherence and Communication: A Qualitative Approach

Background: Immunosuppression nonadherence may be the most important factor limiting long-term allograft survival. Objective: Following user-centered design, we explored the essential priorities and preferences of kidney transplant recipients and healthcare providers (HCP) to inform development of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of kidney health and disease 2022-01, Vol.9, p.20543581211072330-20543581211072330
Hauptverfasser: Schick-Makaroff, Kara, Lagendyk, Laura, Foster, Bethany, Lam, Ngan N., Braam, Branko, Bello, Aminu, Shojai, Soroush, Wen, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Immunosuppression nonadherence may be the most important factor limiting long-term allograft survival. Objective: Following user-centered design, we explored the essential priorities and preferences of kidney transplant recipients and healthcare providers (HCP) to inform development of a smartphone app to improve immunosuppression adherence and communication. Design: A qualitative descriptive research design was used. Setting: The University of Alberta Hospital adult kidney transplant program in Edmonton, Canada. Participants: Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and included 32 kidney transplant recipients and 11 HCPs. Methods: Seven focus groups (5 with recipients and 2 with HCPs) were conducted to inform app development. Sessions were recorded, and transcripts were coded to elucidate themes. Results: App development to improve adherence was not a priority for HCP. Recipients prioritized choice: that all features be optional. Recipients preferred support while traveling; access to laboratory results; and use by younger or newly transplanted recipients. Both recipients and HCP preferred linkage to pharmacy; and self-management and accountability. For the app to improve communication, HCPs believed the priorities to be addressed included: clarity on scope of app; legal, ethical, and professional obligations; and charting. Both recipients and HCP prioritized HCP workload, and broader medication and health concerns. Healthcare providers preferred tech support; both recipients and HCPs preferred app access for nontransplant HCP. Limitations: Limitations include underrepresentation of physicians, recipients with racial/ethnic diversity, and potential selection bias of transplant recipients who perceived themselves to be adhering to immunosuppression medications. Conclusion: Future research is needed for the app to become a comprehensive, secure platform for broader communication between recipients and HCP, pharmacies, and nontransplant clinicians while streamlining HCP workload.
ISSN:2054-3581
2054-3581
DOI:10.1177/20543581211072330