Designing an App for Immunosuppression Adherence and Communication: A Qualitative Approach
Background: Immunosuppression nonadherence may be the most important factor limiting long-term allograft survival. Objective: Following user-centered design, we explored the essential priorities and preferences of kidney transplant recipients and healthcare providers (HCP) to inform development of a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of kidney health and disease 2022-01, Vol.9, p.20543581211072330-20543581211072330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Immunosuppression nonadherence may be the most important factor limiting long-term allograft survival.
Objective:
Following user-centered design, we explored the essential priorities and preferences of kidney transplant recipients and healthcare providers (HCP) to inform development of a smartphone app to improve immunosuppression adherence and communication.
Design:
A qualitative descriptive research design was used.
Setting:
The University of Alberta Hospital adult kidney transplant program in Edmonton, Canada.
Participants:
Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and included 32 kidney transplant recipients and 11 HCPs.
Methods:
Seven focus groups (5 with recipients and 2 with HCPs) were conducted to inform app development. Sessions were recorded, and transcripts were coded to elucidate themes.
Results:
App development to improve adherence was not a priority for HCP. Recipients prioritized choice: that all features be optional. Recipients preferred support while traveling; access to laboratory results; and use by younger or newly transplanted recipients. Both recipients and HCP preferred linkage to pharmacy; and self-management and accountability.
For the app to improve communication, HCPs believed the priorities to be addressed included: clarity on scope of app; legal, ethical, and professional obligations; and charting. Both recipients and HCP prioritized HCP workload, and broader medication and health concerns. Healthcare providers preferred tech support; both recipients and HCPs preferred app access for nontransplant HCP.
Limitations:
Limitations include underrepresentation of physicians, recipients with racial/ethnic diversity, and potential selection bias of transplant recipients who perceived themselves to be adhering to immunosuppression medications.
Conclusion:
Future research is needed for the app to become a comprehensive, secure platform for broader communication between recipients and HCP, pharmacies, and nontransplant clinicians while streamlining HCP workload. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2054-3581 2054-3581 |
DOI: | 10.1177/20543581211072330 |