Nutritional therapy in patients with sepsis: is less really more?
Authors’ response Gustav van Niekerk, Charné Meaker, Anna-Mart Engelbrecht Dear Editor, De Koning et al. refer to a number of studies that they claim provide an empirical challenge to the argument we outlined [4]: that permissive underfeeding (PU) during sepsis could hold therapeutic benefit during...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2020-05, Vol.24 (1), p.254-254, Article 254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Authors’ response Gustav van Niekerk, Charné Meaker, Anna-Mart Engelbrecht Dear Editor, De Koning et al. refer to a number of studies that they claim provide an empirical challenge to the argument we outlined [4]: that permissive underfeeding (PU) during sepsis could hold therapeutic benefit during sepsis. [...]one of the studies that they referred to [5] reported a strikingly high mortality rate in the sepsis cohort (48.7%), supporting the notion that the cohort was experiencing a progressed disease. [...]these patients may not accurately represent the general cohort of sepsis. [...]in another study cited [6], the conclusion was that, in septic patients, “late medium protein and late high energy intake were associated with survival benefit.” |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1364-8535 1466-609X 1364-8535 1366-609X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13054-020-02949-9 |