Nutritional therapy in patients with sepsis: is less really more?

Authors’ response Gustav van Niekerk, Charné Meaker, Anna-Mart Engelbrecht Dear Editor, De Koning et al. refer to a number of studies that they claim provide an empirical challenge to the argument we outlined [4]: that permissive underfeeding (PU) during sepsis could hold therapeutic benefit during...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2020-05, Vol.24 (1), p.254-254, Article 254
Hauptverfasser: de Koning, Marie-Sophie Louise Yvonne, van Zanten, Florianne Johanna Louise, van Zanten, Arthur Raymond Hubert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Authors’ response Gustav van Niekerk, Charné Meaker, Anna-Mart Engelbrecht Dear Editor, De Koning et al. refer to a number of studies that they claim provide an empirical challenge to the argument we outlined [4]: that permissive underfeeding (PU) during sepsis could hold therapeutic benefit during sepsis. [...]one of the studies that they referred to [5] reported a strikingly high mortality rate in the sepsis cohort (48.7%), supporting the notion that the cohort was experiencing a progressed disease. [...]these patients may not accurately represent the general cohort of sepsis. [...]in another study cited [6], the conclusion was that, in septic patients, “late medium protein and late high energy intake were associated with survival benefit.”
ISSN:1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
1366-609X
DOI:10.1186/s13054-020-02949-9