Does proactive care in care homes improve survival? A quality improvement project

BackgroundNHS England’s ‘Enhanced Health in Care Homes’ specification aims to make the healthcare of care home residents more proactive. Primary care networks (PCNs) are contracted to provide this, but approaches vary widely: challenges include frailty identification, multidisciplinary team (MDT) ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open quality 2024-06, Vol.13 (2), p.e002771
Hauptverfasser: Attwood, David, Hope, Suzy V, Spicer, Stuart G, Gordon, Adam L, Boorer, James, Ellis, Wendy, Earley, Michelle, Denovan, Jillian, Hart, Gerard, Williams, Maria, Burdett, Nicholas, Lemon, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundNHS England’s ‘Enhanced Health in Care Homes’ specification aims to make the healthcare of care home residents more proactive. Primary care networks (PCNs) are contracted to provide this, but approaches vary widely: challenges include frailty identification, multidisciplinary team (MDT) capability/capacity and how the process is structured and delivered.AimTo determine whether a proactive healthcare model could improve healthcare outcomes for care home residents.Design and settingQuality improvement project involving 429 residents in 40 care homes in a non-randomised crossover cohort design. The headline outcome was 2-year survival.MethodAll care home residents had healthcare coordinated by the PCN’s Older Peoples’ Hub. A daily MDT managed the urgent healthcare needs of residents. Proactive healthcare, comprising information technology-assisted comprehensive geriatric assessment (i-CGA) and advanced care planning (ACP), were completed by residents, with prioritisation based on clinical needs.Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used with patients divided into two groups:Control group: received routine and urgent (reactive) care only.Intervention group: additional proactive i-CGA and ACP.ResultsBy 2 years, control group survival was 8.6% (n=108), compared with 48.1% in the intervention group (n=321), p
ISSN:2399-6641
2399-6641
DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002771