Knowledge and Current Practices in Monogenic Uveitis: An International Survey by IUSG and AIDA Network

Introduction This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts. Methods This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology and Therapy 2024-01, Vol.13 (1), p.127-147
Hauptverfasser: Gaggiano, Carla, Gupta, Vishali, Agrawal, Rupesh, De Smet, Marc D., Frediani, Bruno, Tosi, Gian Marco, Paroli, Maria Pia, Sridharan, Sudharshan, Pavesio, Carlos E., Pleyer, Uwe, Denisova, Ekaterina V., Babu, Kalpana, de-la-Torre, Alejandra, Yang, Peizeng, Davis, Janet L., Cunningham, Emmett T., Carreño, Ester, Goldstein, Debra, Fonollosa, Alex, Cantarini, Luca, Sobrin, Lucia, Fabiani, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts. Methods This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the Autoinflammatory Diseases Alliance (AIDA) Network and International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG). We included respondents answering ≥ 50% of the survey. Results Seventy-seven participants rated their knowledge of mU as proficient (3.9%), adequate (15.6%), sufficient (16.9%), or poor (63.6%). When asked about the first mU gene they thought of, 60.4% mentioned NOD2 , 3.9% mentioned NLRP3 or MEFV , and 49.4% provided incorrect or no answers. Success rates in clinical scenarios varied from 15.6% to 55.8% and were higher for ophthalmologists working in multidisciplinary teams ( p   0.05). The public healthcare system ensured a higher percentage of tests prescribed were obtained by patients compared to private insurances ( p  
ISSN:2193-8245
2193-6528
DOI:10.1007/s40123-023-00839-1