Knowledge and Current Practices in Monogenic Uveitis: An International Survey by IUSG and AIDA Network
Introduction This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts. Methods This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology and Therapy 2024-01, Vol.13 (1), p.127-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts.
Methods
This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the Autoinflammatory Diseases Alliance (AIDA) Network and International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG). We included respondents answering ≥ 50% of the survey.
Results
Seventy-seven participants rated their knowledge of mU as proficient (3.9%), adequate (15.6%), sufficient (16.9%), or poor (63.6%). When asked about the first mU gene they thought of, 60.4% mentioned
NOD2
, 3.9% mentioned
NLRP3
or
MEFV
, and 49.4% provided incorrect or no answers. Success rates in clinical scenarios varied from 15.6% to 55.8% and were higher for ophthalmologists working in multidisciplinary teams (
p
0.05). The public healthcare system ensured a higher percentage of tests prescribed were obtained by patients compared to private insurances (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2193-8245 2193-6528 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40123-023-00839-1 |