Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
To determine the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, likelihood, and correlation of the findings of meniscal tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to knee video arthroscopy. A cross-sectional study, conducted between June and December 2015, which evaluated 84 patients with meniscal tears (MT) s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista brasileira de ortopedia 2017-09, Vol.52 (5), p.582-588 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, likelihood, and correlation of the findings of meniscal tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to knee video arthroscopy.
A cross-sectional study, conducted between June and December 2015, which evaluated 84 patients with meniscal tears (MT) selected for video arthroscopy. Two orthopedic trainees and a resident performed a physical examination with specific tests. The results and reports from MRI were compared with arthroscopy findings. The data were analyzed in the statistical program R.
The Steinmann I test was the most specific, with specificity of 86% and 91% for medial meniscus tears (MMT) and lateral meniscus tears (LMT), respectively. With regard to accuracy, the pain test on palpation of the joint interline (PPJI) showed values of 67% and 73% for detection of MMT and LMT, respectively. The PPJI test showed higher sensitivity, with a 77% chance of detecting MMT. Analysis of the set of three tests (McMurray, PPJI, and Steinmann I) compared to arthroscopy showed 85% sensitivity for MMT and 70% sensitivity for LMT. MRI showed a greater specificity for the diagnosis of MMT and LMT; the values were 82% and 91%, respectively.
The combination of the three tests shows better results compared to the isolated tests and thus can be associated to the MRI to make an effective diagnosis. However, further studies assisting in the development of a protocol to standardize diagnostic evaluation are required.
Determinar a especificidade, sensibilidade, acurácia, razão de verossimilhança e correlação dos achados dos testes meniscais e da ressonância magnética (RM) com a videoartroscopia do joelho.
Estudo transversal feito entre junho e dezembro de 2015. Avaliaram-se 84 pacientes selecionados para tratamento videoartroscópico das lesões meniscais (LM). Dois ortopedistas especializados em cirurgia do joelho e um residente em ortopedia fizeram o exame físico com testes específicos. Os resultados obtidos e laudos da RM foram comparados com os achados da videoartroscopia. Os dados foram tratados no programa estatístico R.
O teste de Steinmann I foi mais específico, com especificidade de 86% e 91% para lesões de menisco medial (LMM) e lesões de menisco lateral (LML), respectivamente. Quanto à acurácia, o teste de dor à palpação da interlinha articular (DPIA) apresentou valores de 67% e 73% para detecção de LMM e LML, respectivamente. O teste de DPIA apresentou maior sensibilidade, com 77% de chance de detectar LMM. A a |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2255-4971 1982-4378 2255-4971 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.09.009 |