Subaxial lordosis loss and influence factors after posterior atlantoaxial fusion

Cervical sagittal balance is an important evaluation index of cervical physiological function and surgical efficacy. Subaxial kyphosis after atlantoaxial fusion is negatively associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher incidence of lower cervical disk degeneration. This study aimed to confirm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.183-183, Article 183
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Shaoqiang, Liu, Boling, Liang, Guiqing, Chen, Qiyong, Wang, Huafeng, Lin, Yuhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cervical sagittal balance is an important evaluation index of cervical physiological function and surgical efficacy. Subaxial kyphosis after atlantoaxial fusion is negatively associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher incidence of lower cervical disk degeneration. This study aimed to confirm the factors that influence subaxial lordosis loss after posterior atlantoaxial fusion. We performed a retrospective review of all patients following posterior C1-C2 fusion for atlantoaxial dislocation between January 2015 and December 2017. All charts, records, and imaging studies were reviewed for each case, and preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up plain films were evaluated. Comparing final follow-up and preoperative C2-C7 angle, patients were divided into two groups for further comparison: subaxial lordosis loss group and subaxial lordosis increase group. A total of 18 patients were included in the review, with an average radiographic follow-up of 8.4 ± 3.7 months (range 6-17 months). Subaxial lordosis loss was observed in 5 cases (27.8%) at the final follow-up, whereas 13 cases had an increase in subaxial lordosis. The cervical sagittal parameters of preoperative and final follow-up between two groups were compared, the preoperative C2-C7 angle of the subaxial lordosis loss group was bigger than the subaxial lordosis increase group (27.6° ± 10.5° vs 10.5° ± 10.5°, P 
ISSN:1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-022-03077-6