Cost-effectiveness of budesonide-formoterol in maintenance therapy of asthma patients at Mexico’s National Center for Respiratory Diseases
Objective: to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of asthma treatment with budesonide/formoterol against other treatment options used at Mexico’s National Institute for Respiratory Diseases. Methods: A complete economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness from a public health perspective, comparing t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Pueblo, Mexico : 1993) Pueblo, Mexico : 1993), 2024-12, Vol.71 (4), p.218-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of asthma treatment with budesonide/formoterol against other treatment options used at Mexico’s National Institute for Respiratory Diseases. Methods: A complete economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness from a public health perspective, comparing the use of budesonide/formoterol as maintenance therapy with fluticasone/vilanterol in 103 female asthma patients managed at INER between 2015 and 2021. Results: Average cost per patient was $743.23 USD, $733.36 USD for budesonide/formoterol and $767.24 USD for fluticasone/vilanterol. Pharmacological treatment represented over 70% of management costs for both groups, followed by follow-up visits and exacerbation management costs. LABA-ICS represented the highest proportion of pharmacologic management costs with a statistically significant difference amongst groups with an incremental cost of $80.17 USD for the fluticasone/vilanterol group. The budesonide/formoterol group showed an ICER of $613.31 USD for reducing the proportion of patients experiencing exacerbations during follow-up. Considering the willingness to pay threshold based on one GDP per capita ($10,902.98 USD in 2022), budesonide/formoterol represented a very cost-effective option. Conclusions: The ICER favored budesonide/formoterol over fluticasone/vilanterol in terms of cost-effectiveness. A 5.5% reduction in patient exacerbations indicated decreased disease burden. While not statistically significant, fewer exacerbations per patient might still cut costs by lowering emergency visits and hospitalizations. Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Asthma; Budesonide; Formoterol fumarate.
Objetivo: Estimar el costo-efectividad del tratamiento del asma con budesonida-formoterol vs otros protocolos prescritos en el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias de México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo la evaluación económica completa desde una perspectiva de salud pública, comparando budesonida-formoterol con fluticasona-vilanterol como terapias de mantenimiento en 103 pacientes asmáticos entre 2015 y 2021. Resultados: El costo promedio por paciente fue de $743.23 dólares; $733.36 dólares para budesonida-formoterol y $767.24 para fluticasonavilanterol. En ambos grupos, más del 70% de los costos se destinaron al tratamiento farmacológico, seguido de las visitas de seguimiento y los costos de tratamiento por exacerbaciones. La mayor parte de los costos farmacológicos se debió a LABA-ICS, con una diferencia sign |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-5151 2448-9190 |
DOI: | 10.29262/ram.v71i4.1295 |