Feasibility of Local Anaesthesia in Various Upper Abdominal Surgical Procedures; A Tertiary Care Hospital Study

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of local anaesthesia instead of general anaesthesia in upper gastrointestinal abdominal procedures including open gastrostomy, gastrojejunostomy, gastroduodenal disjunction, jejunostomy and traction esophageal stenting. Materials and Methods:  Department of Tho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of frontier sciences 2022-09, Vol.6 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Muhammad Azeem Gulzar, Muhammad Raza, Salma Parveen, Anum Shahid, Sana Naseem, muhammad imran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of local anaesthesia instead of general anaesthesia in upper gastrointestinal abdominal procedures including open gastrostomy, gastrojejunostomy, gastroduodenal disjunction, jejunostomy and traction esophageal stenting. Materials and Methods:  Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nishtar Medical University and Hospital Multan Pakistan, from September 1st, 2020 to December 31st, 2020. Total 147 patients were selected for the study, of which 80 patients were operated under local anaesthesia while 67 patients were operated under general anaesthesia. The procedures performed included open gastrostomy, gastrojejunostomy, gastroduodenal disjunction and feeding jejunostomy and traction rigid esophageal stenting. Age, BMI, gender, type of procedure performed, primary etiology, mean procedure time, stay in recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative pain at 4 hours, 8 hours and at 12 hours, postoperative sedation, postoperative patient discomfort, within 3 days postoperative mortality and within 7 days mortality were documented and compared between the two groups. Results: Mean age of the patients in group LA was significantly higher as compared to that of patients in group GA (p0.05). Procedure time and mean duration of stay in recovery was shorter in group LA (p
ISSN:2618-0359
2618-0367