Local impedance measurements during contact force‐guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for predicting an effective radiofrequency ablation

Background An ablation catheter capable of contact force (CF) and local impedance (LI) monitoring (IntellaNav StablePoint, Boston Scientific) has been recently launched. We evaluated the relationship between the CF and LI values during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) along the cavotricuspid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of arrhythmia 2022-04, Vol.38 (2), p.245-252
Hauptverfasser: Sasaki, Takehito, Nakamura, Kohki, Minami, Kentaro, Take, Yutaka, Nakatani, Yosuke, Miki, Yuko, Goto, Koji, Kaseno, Kenichi, Yamashita, Eiji, Koyama, Keiko, Naito, Shigeto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background An ablation catheter capable of contact force (CF) and local impedance (LI) monitoring (IntellaNav StablePoint, Boston Scientific) has been recently launched. We evaluated the relationship between the CF and LI values during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) along the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI). Methods Fifty consecutive subjects who underwent a CTI‐RFCA using IntellaNav StablePoint catheters were retrospectively studied. The initial CF and LI at the start of the RF applications and mean CF and minimum LI during the RF applications were measured. The absolute and percentage LI drops were calculated as the difference between the initial and minimum LIs and 100 × absolute LI drop/initial LI, respectively. Results We analyzed 602 first‐pass RF applications. A weak correlation was observed between the initial CF and LI (r = 0.13) and between the mean CF and LI drops (r = 0.22). The initial LI and absolute and percentage LI drops were greater at effective ablation sites than ineffective ablation sites (median, 151 vs. 138 Ω, 22 vs. 14 Ω, and 14.4% vs. 9.9%; p 
ISSN:1880-4276
1883-2148
DOI:10.1002/joa3.12680