Surgical management of atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A French nationwide studyCentral MessagePerspective
Objective: The study objective was to assess the efficacity of different surgical strategies for atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Methods: Between January 2010 and April 2023, all patients with a diagnosis of atrioesophageal fistula or pericardo-esophageal fist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JTCVS open 2024-12, Vol.22, p.476-484 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: The study objective was to assess the efficacity of different surgical strategies for atrioesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Methods: Between January 2010 and April 2023, all patients with a diagnosis of atrioesophageal fistula or pericardo-esophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation were analyzed retrospectively from the French database EPITHOR. Patients without surgical management were excluded. Results: Eighteen patients were included, 15 with atrioesophageal fistula and 3 with pericardo-esophageal fistula. Median follow-up was 89.5 days with an overall survival of 50%. Five patients underwent esophageal stenting, 2 as a bridge-to-esophagectomy with 50% of survival and 3 in association with esophagus and left atrial direct repair with 66% survival. Primary esophageal repair with flap coverage was performed in 8 patients with 25% survival, most of them with sepsis and neurological failure. Seven patients had an esophagectomy with 71% survival, only 2 of them having a neurological failure. Among them, 5 patients underwent a restorative surgery and are still alive. Four patients had a retrosternal colon interposition, and 1 patient had an esogastric anastomosis. Risk factors for death were neurological failure (hazard ratio [HR], 4.91, 95% CI, 0.95-25.22; P = .0057) in univariate analysis and sepsis (HR, 6.25, 95% CI, 1.17-33.3; P = .032) in multivariate analysis. Esophagectomy tended to offer a survival benefit (HR, 0.163, 95% CI, 0.019-1.340; P = .092). The use of cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly impact survival (HR, 1.953, 95% CI, 0.392-9.719; P = .413). Conclusions: Aggressive surgical strategies for managing atrioesophageal fistula are mandatory to offer the best chance of survival. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2666-2736 |