Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Marine SOx Scrubber Systems

This paper aims to identify the best solution for three SOx scrubber systems by evaluating their economic, environmental and technical performances: open-loop, closed-loop and hybrid scrubber systems. It adopted a novel muti-criteria decision-making model which can be introduced as the combination o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marine science and engineering 2022-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1599
1. Verfasser: Jee, Jaehoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper aims to identify the best solution for three SOx scrubber systems by evaluating their economic, environmental and technical performances: open-loop, closed-loop and hybrid scrubber systems. It adopted a novel muti-criteria decision-making model which can be introduced as the combination of lifecycle cost and lifecycle assessments, and fuzzy-TOPSIS and fuzzy-AHP. The analysis results of the case study of 72,100 gross-ton cargo ships suggested that the closed-loop scrubber systems would be the most effective in the consideration of all of the aspects, overall. It also shows the excellence of the proposed decision-making model to remedy the shortcomings of the conventional multi-criteria decision-making process by directing the analytic process in a wiser way, by means of fuzzy elements. For the environmental impact assessment, the lifecycle assessment approach enables one to obtain a holistic view of the Lifecycle emissions from the cradle to the grave. This paper finally shows the effectiveness of the proposed method, which can improve confidence in decision-making by extending a short-term view widely. Therefore, it was strongly believed that the proposed model is not necessarily/limitedly applied to marine systems but can be broad and noteworthy for a variety of studies requiring appropriate decision-making.
ISSN:2077-1312
2077-1312
DOI:10.3390/jmse10111599