The kindness COVID-19 toolkit: a mixed-methods evaluation of a programme designed by doctors in training for doctors in training

ObjectivesThe impact of a coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-specific professional development programme on the well-being of obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) doctors in training (DiT) working during the pandemic.DesignA mixed-method evaluation of a single group pre–post test design study.SettingMel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2022-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e060575
Hauptverfasser: Ward, Madeleine C, Crinall, Karen, McDonald, Rebecca, Crinall, William, Aridas, James, Leung, Cheryl, Quittner, Danielle, Hodges, Ryan J, Rolnik, Daniel L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesThe impact of a coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-specific professional development programme on the well-being of obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) doctors in training (DiT) working during the pandemic.DesignA mixed-method evaluation of a single group pre–post test design study.SettingMelbourne, Australia between September 2020 and April 2021.Participants55 O&G DiT working across four healthcare sites of a major tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia, were included in the programme.InterventionsThe delivery of a codesigned peer-to-peer programme, which identified and addressed the well-being goals of O&G DiT. Seven interactive workshops were run alongside the implementation of a number of participant-led wellness initiatives.Main outcome measuresRepeated-measures analysis of WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5) and Copenhagen Burnout Innovatory (CBI) scores across three time points during the programme. Multilevel generalised linear mixed-effects models with random intercept were fit to the data, both in the entire population (intention-to-treat) and restricted to those who attended the workshop (‘per-protocol’ analysis). Participatory experiences and programme learning were captured using the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique, which included inductive thematic analysis.ResultsWe demonstrated an overall 31.9% improvement in well-being scores (p=0.006). The MSC evaluation captured a shift in workplace culture as a result of the programme, with improvement across the domains of connection, caring, communication, confidence and cooperation.ConclusionsWe have successfully used a mixed-method approach to contextualise a productive programme to improve the well-being of COVID-19 front-line healthcare workers.
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060575