Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Plus Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy
Objective: To determine the peri-operative analgesic efficacy and quality of block by adding Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional Study. Place and Duration of Study: Anesthesia De...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2022-12, Vol.72 (6), p.1908-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To determine the peri-operative analgesic efficacy and quality of block by adding Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional Study.
Place and Duration of Study: Anesthesia Department, Nishtar Hospital, Multan Pakistan, Jan to Jun 2019.Methodology: A total of 100 women aged 30-65 years, who were planned for abdominal hysterectomy due to benign causes, and having ASA) status I-II were included. The patients were divided into two equal groups. In Group-B, 12.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric diluted in 3ml normal saline was administered for induction of spinal anaesthesia. In contrast, in Group-B+D, 10µg Dexmedetomidine and 12.5mg 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine diluted in 3ml normal saline were given. Time of sensory and motor block onset, total duration of the block, and analgesia were noted.
Results: The mean time of sensory and motor onset was significantly lower in the Group-B+D. The total duration of sensory block was 181.6±31.6 minutes in Group-B versus 345.2±23.5 minutes in Group-B+D (p-value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0030-9648 2411-8842 |
DOI: | 10.51253/pafmj.v72i6.4349 |