Obtaining evidence base for the development of Feel4Diabetes intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes - a narrative literature review

Feel4Diabetes was a school and community based intervention aiming to promote healthy lifestyle and tackle obesity for the prevention of type 2 diabetes among families in 6 European countries. We conducted this literature review in order to guide the development of evidence-based implementation of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC endocrine disorders 2020-03, Vol.20 (Suppl 1), p.140-140, Article 140
Hauptverfasser: Kivelä, Jemina, Wikström, Katja, Virtanen, Eeva, Georgoulis, Michael, Cardon, Greet, Civeira, Fernando, Iotova, Violeta, Karuranga, Ernest, Ko, Winne, Liatis, Stavros, Makrilakis, Konstantinos, Manios, Yannis, Mateo-Gallego, Rocío, Nanasi, Anna, Rurik, Imre, Tankova, Tsvetalina, Tsochev, Kaloyan, Van Stappen, Vicky, Lindström, Jaana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Feel4Diabetes was a school and community based intervention aiming to promote healthy lifestyle and tackle obesity for the prevention of type 2 diabetes among families in 6 European countries. We conducted this literature review in order to guide the development of evidence-based implementation of the Feel4Diabetes intervention. We focused on type 2 diabetes prevention strategies, including all the phases from risk identification to implementation and maintenance. Special focus was given to prevention among vulnerable groups and people under 45 years. Scientific and grey literature published between January 2000 and January 2015 was searched for relevant studies using electronic databases. To present the literature review findings in a systematic way, we used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A complementary literature search from February 2015 to December 2018 was also conducted. The initial review included 27 studies with a follow-up ≥12 months and 9 studies with a follow-up ≥6 months and with a participant mean age 
ISSN:1472-6823
1472-6823
DOI:10.1186/s12902-019-0468-y