Why can’t artificial language contain the truth? A focus on Foucault’s and Heidegger’s discussions

This article seeks to argue that although AI language has developed to the level where it can answer human questions, AI language cannot yet contain the truth. In the AI era, humans who speak their minds will no longer express their thoughts directly in words and will depend more on AI’s artificial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Humanities & social sciences communications 2024-09, Vol.11 (1), p.1230-9, Article 1230
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Bun-Sun, Jo, Hongjoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article seeks to argue that although AI language has developed to the level where it can answer human questions, AI language cannot yet contain the truth. In the AI era, humans who speak their minds will no longer express their thoughts directly in words and will depend more on AI’s artificial language. However, it is only a question for now whether AI will be able to substitute for human speech and whether such a fact will contribute to the expansion of human thinking and the state of being. Accordingly, in this paper, we try to identify the limitations of artificial intelligence language by precisely clarifying the meaning of human language and discourse. Foucault and Heidegger’s discussion of discourse deals with issues of language, subject, existence, and authentic discourse. We use their discussions as a tool to illuminate our own perspectives. Therefore, we will re-analyze the language produced in the AI environment in relation to the issue of truth.
ISSN:2662-9992
2662-9992
DOI:10.1057/s41599-024-03648-4