Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement are Worse in Patients with Ipsilateral Hindfoot Fusion

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Hindfoot (subtalar and/or talonavicular) fusion is a commonly used procedure to treat arthritis and/or deformity. As a result, some patients with ankle arthritis who undergo total ankle replacement (TAR) have a history of prior hindfoot fusio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2024-12, Vol.9 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Teehan, Emily, Boden, Allison L., Henry, Jensen, Demetracopoulos, Constantine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Category: Ankle Arthritis; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Hindfoot (subtalar and/or talonavicular) fusion is a commonly used procedure to treat arthritis and/or deformity. As a result, some patients with ankle arthritis who undergo total ankle replacement (TAR) have a history of prior hindfoot fusion or undergo concomitant hindfoot fusion at the time of TAR. Previous studies have demonstrated hindfoot fusion as a risk factor for failure of TAR and associated with worse clinical outcomes. This study seeks to determine if these findings are reproducible by evaluating clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of primary TAR with ipsilateral hindfoot fusion at a minimum 2-years follow-up from primary TAR. We hypothesized that TAR patients with ipsilateral hindfoot fusion would have higher rates of revision and worse PROs compared to controls. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data within an institutional registry was performed. Inclusion criteria for this study were patients undergoing primary TAR (Cadence, Inbone, Invision, Infinity, Salto, Vantage, or Zimmer) between October 2015 and January 2022, with or without prior/concomitant ipsilateral hindfoot fusion, with preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores. 400 TARs met inclusion criteria for analysis. Demographic, clinical, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographs were collected. Radiographic complications (including cysts, lucency, subsidence) were recorded. Multivariate linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations of hindfoot fusion, implant type, reoperations (defined as any surgical procedure following primary TAA, including retention of metal implants with polyethylene explant), revisions (defined as exchange of tibial and/or talar components), and demographics with 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores. Finally, proportions of patients meeting PROMIS thresholds for the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) at 2-years postoperative was compared between groups via Pearson Chi square tests. Results: Of 400 ankles included, 49 (12.3%) had ipsilateral hindfoot fusion. In multivariate analysis, hindfoot fusion patients had significantly worse 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores in all domains (except depression) versus patients without hindfoot fusion. Preoperative PROMIS domains were predictive of 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores for each respective domain (except pain intensity) (Figure). Hindfoot fusion patients had a significantly higher rate of
ISSN:2473-0114
2473-0114
DOI:10.1177/2473011424S00411