Comprehensive genome profiling by next generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in solid tumors: a single academic institution experience

Background: Recently, new evidence of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsy utility in clinical practice has been developed. This assay is emerging as a new promising tool to use as a noninvasive biomarker for cancer mutation profiling. Additional data supporting the clinical validity o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 2022, Vol.14, p.17588359221096878
Hauptverfasser: Caputo, Vincenza, De Falco, Vincenzo, Ventriglia, Anna, Famiglietti, Vincenzo, Martinelli, Erika, Morgillo, Floriana, Martini, Giulia, Corte, Carminia Maria Della, Ciardiello, Davide, Poliero, Luca, De Vita, Ferdinando, Orditura, Michele, Fasano, Morena, Franco, Renato, Caraglia, Michele, Avitabile, Arianna, Scalamogna, Roberto, Marchi, Beatrice, Ciardiello, Fortunato, Troiani, Teresa, Napolitano, Stefania
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Recently, new evidence of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsy utility in clinical practice has been developed. This assay is emerging as a new promising tool to use as a noninvasive biomarker for cancer mutation profiling. Additional data supporting the clinical validity of cell free DNA (cfDNA) based testing is necessary to inform optimal use of these assays in the clinic. Materials and methods: A total of 398 cancer patients were analyzed by FoundationOne Liquid Analysis (F1LA), a genomic profiling assay and by standard NGS diagnostic ThermoFisher platform. The association between diagnostic technique was evaluated using a Poisson regression model. FoundationOne Liquid (F1L) and FoundationOne Liquid CDx (F1LCDx) detect 70 and 324 cancer-related genes alterations, respectively, including genomic signatures tumor fraction, blood tumor mutational burden (only for the 324 genes version), and microsatellite instability high status. Both assays used a single DNA extraction method to obtain cfDNA. The real-life clinical impact and feasibility of F1L and F1LCDx were evaluated across different solid tumors in our department. Results: Between 1 January 2019 and 28 February 2021, 398 samples of different tumor types from 398 patients were analyzed (overall success rate: 92%, in FoundationOne Liquid CDx Analysis success rate: 97%). Most frequent molecular alterations were TP53 (74), APC (40), DNMT3A (39), KRAS (23). The comprehensive clinical impact of F1LA compared with standard diagnostic was 64.7% versus 22.1% [risk ratio (RR) = 2.94; p 
ISSN:1758-8359
1758-8340
1758-8359
DOI:10.1177/17588359221096878