Hybrid Renewable Systems for Small Energy Communities: What Is the Best Solution?

This research developed smart integrated hybrid renewable systems for small energy communities and applied them to a real system to achieve energy self-sufficiency and promote sustainable decentralized energy generation. It compares stand-alone (SA) and grid-connected (GC) configurations using a dev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2024-11, Vol.14 (21), p.10052
Hauptverfasser: Coelho, João S. T., Pérez-Sánchez, Modesto, Coronado-Hernández, Oscar E., Sánchez-Romero, Francisco-Javier, McNabola, Aonghus, Ramos, Helena M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This research developed smart integrated hybrid renewable systems for small energy communities and applied them to a real system to achieve energy self-sufficiency and promote sustainable decentralized energy generation. It compares stand-alone (SA) and grid-connected (GC) configurations using a developed optimized mathematical model and data-driven optimization, with economic analysis of various renewable combinations (PV, Wind, PHS, BESS, and Grid) to search for the optimal solution. Four cases were developed: two stand-alone (SA1: PV + Wind + PHS, SA2: PV + Wind + PHS + BESS) and two grid-connected (GC1: PV + PHS + Grid, GC2: Wind + PHS + Grid). GC2 shows the most economical with stable cash flow (−€123.2 annually), low CO2 costs (€367.2), and 91.7% of grid independence, requiring 125 kW of installed power. While GC options had lower initial investments (between €157k to €205k), the SA configurations provided lower levelized costs of energy (LCOE) ranging from €0.039 to €0.044/kWh. The integration of pumped hydropower storage enhances energy independence, supporting peak loads for up to two days with a storage capacity of 2.17 MWh.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app142110052