Endoscopic rhizotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain

BackgroundChronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain is a common cause of chronic low back pain. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the effective management options; however, the results from the traditional RFA need to be improved in certain cases. The aim of this study is to investi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2020-01, Vol.15 (1), p.4-4, Article 4
Hauptverfasser: Xue, Yuntao, Ding, Tao, Wang, Dajie, Zhao, Jianli, Yang, Huilin, Gu, Xiaofeng, Feng, Dehong, Zhang, Yafeng, Liu, Hao, Tang, Fenglin, Wang, Wanyi, Lu, Miao, Wu, Chao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundChronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain is a common cause of chronic low back pain. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the effective management options; however, the results from the traditional RFA need to be improved in certain cases. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation under endoscopic guidance (ERFA) for chronic low back pain secondary to facet joint arthritis.MethodsThis is a prospective study enrolled 60 patients. The cases were randomized into two groups: 30 patients in the control group underwent traditional percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, others underwent ERFA. The lumbar visual analog scale (VAS), MacNab score, and postoperative complications were used to evaluate the outcomes. All outcome assessments were performed at postoperative 1day, 1month, 3months, 6months, and 12months.ResultsThere was no difference between the two groups in preoperative VAS (P > 0.05). VAS scores, except the postoperative first day, in all other postoperative time points were significantly lower than preoperative values each in both groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in VAS at 1day, 1month, and 3months after surgery (P > 0.05). However, the EFRA demonstrated significant benefits at the time points of 3months and 6months (P > 0.05). The MacNab scores of 1-year follow-up in the ERFA group were higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the ERFA group was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionsERFA may achieve more accurate and definite denervation on the nerves, which leads to longer lasting pain relief.
ISSN:1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-019-1533-y