Prevalence of Lynch syndrome in women with mismatch repair‐deficient ovarian cancer

Background There are limited data on the prevalence of Lynch syndrome (LS) in women with primary ovarian cancer with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR‐D) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Materials and Methods Three hundred and eight cases of primary ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer between Janu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2021-02, Vol.10 (3), p.1012-1017
Hauptverfasser: Hodan, Rachel, Kingham, Kerry, Cotter, Kristina, Folkins, Ann K., Kurian, Allison W., Ford, James M., Longacre, Teri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There are limited data on the prevalence of Lynch syndrome (LS) in women with primary ovarian cancer with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR‐D) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Materials and Methods Three hundred and eight cases of primary ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer between January 2012 and December 2019 were evaluated for MMR‐D by IHC. The incidence of LS in this cohort was evaluated. Results MMR‐D by IHC was identified in 16 of 308 (5.2%) (95% CI: 3.2%–8.3%) primary ovarian‐related cancers. Most cases with MMR‐D were endometrioid (n = 11, 68.7%); (95% CI: 44.2%–86.1%). MSH2/MSH6 protein loss was detected in eight cases (50.0%); (95% CI: 28.0%–72.0%) and MLH1/PMS2 protein loss was detected in four cases (25.0%); (95% CI: 9.7%–50.0%). MSH6 protein loss was detected in two cases (12.5%); (95% CI: 2.2%–37.3%) and PMS2 protein loss was detected in two cases (12.5%); (95% CI: 2.2%–37.3%). All four cases with MLH1/PMS2 protein loss had MLH1 promotor hypermethylation. All 12 women with ovarian cancer suggestive of LS underwent germline testing and 8 (66.6%); (95% CI: 38.8%–86.5%) were confirmed to have LS. Conclusions Most ovarian cancers with somatic MMR‐D were confirmed to have LS in this cohort. Germline testing for LS in addition to BRCA1/2 for all women with an epithelial ovarian cancer would be efficient and would approach 100% sensitivity for identifying Lynch syndrome. Utilization of a multigene panel should also be considered, given the additional non‐Lynch germline mutation identified in this cohort. The majority of mismatch repair deficient ovarian cancer in this cohort was due to a Lynch syndrome (LS) germline pathogenic variant. Clinicians should consider germline testing for LS for all women with epithelial ovarian cancer.
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.3688