Focal Dice Loss-Based V-Net for Liver Segments Classification

Liver segmentation is a crucial step in surgical planning from computed tomography scans. The possibility to obtain a precise delineation of the liver boundaries with the exploitation of automatic techniques can help the radiologists, reducing the annotation time and providing more objective and rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2022-04, Vol.12 (7), p.3247
Hauptverfasser: Prencipe, Berardino, Altini, Nicola, Cascarano, Giacomo Donato, Brunetti, Antonio, Guerriero, Andrea, Bevilacqua, Vitoantonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Liver segmentation is a crucial step in surgical planning from computed tomography scans. The possibility to obtain a precise delineation of the liver boundaries with the exploitation of automatic techniques can help the radiologists, reducing the annotation time and providing more objective and repeatable results. Subsequent phases typically involve liver vessels’ segmentation and liver segments’ classification. It is especially important to recognize different segments, since each has its own vascularization, and so, hepatic segmentectomies can be performed during surgery, avoiding the unnecessary removal of healthy liver parenchyma. In this work, we focused on the liver segments’ classification task. We exploited a 2.5D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), namely V-Net, trained with the multi-class focal Dice loss. The idea of focal loss was originally thought as the cross-entropy loss function, aiming at focusing on “hard” samples, avoiding the gradient being overwhelmed by a large number of falsenegatives. In this paper, we introduce two novel focal Dice formulations, one based on the concept of individual voxel’s probability and another related to the Dice formulation for sets. By applying multi-class focal Dice loss to the aforementioned task, we were able to obtain respectable results, with an average Dice coefficient among classes of 82.91%. Moreover, the knowledge of anatomic segments’ configurations allowed the application of a set of rules during the post-processing phase, slightly improving the final segmentation results, obtaining an average Dice coefficient of 83.38%. The average accuracy was close to 99%. The best model turned out to be the one with the focal Dice formulation based on sets. We conducted the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to check if these results were statistically significant, confirming their relevance.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app12073247