What are the effects of Teach For America on Math, English Language Arts, and Science outcomes of K–12 students in the USA?
This Campbell systematic review examines the impact of Teach For America (TFA) on learning outcomes. Four studies were included in the review. Studies had to be a quantitative evaluation of the effects of TFA on K—12 student academic outcomes. Studies also had to use a research design which: 1. allo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Campbell systematic review 2018, Vol.14 (1), p.1-60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This Campbell systematic review examines the impact of Teach For America (TFA) on learning outcomes. Four studies were included in the review.
Studies had to be a quantitative evaluation of the effects of TFA on K—12 student academic outcomes. Studies also had to use a research design which: 1. allowed valid causal inferences about TFA's effects, 2. targeted participants K—12 students taught by TFA corps members or TFA alumni in the USA, 3. compared TFA corps members to novice teachers, or compared TFA alumni with veteran teachers, and 4. reported at least one academic student outcome in math, ELA, or science domains.
A total of 919 citations were retrieved on TFA, of which 24 studies were eligible for review. However, when the research design and study quality along with types of TFA corps members and non‐TFA teachers compared were reviewed, the evidence base for estimating the effects of TFA on student academic outcomes was reduced to just four studies.
There is no significant effect on reading from teaching by TFA corps members in their first or second year of teaching elementary‐grade students (PreK — grade 5) compared to non‐TFA teachers who are also in their first or second year of teaching elementary‐grade students. There is a small positive effect for early elementary‐grade students (PreK to grade 2) in reading but not in math.
However, given the small evidence base, these findings should be treated with caution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1891-1803 1891-1803 |
DOI: | 10.4073/csr.2018.7 |