Comparing laboratory surveillance with the notifiable diseases surveillance system in South Africa

Highlights • The South African laboratory and notification surveillance systems were compared. • For the three tracer diseases, fewer cases were notified than laboratory confirmed. • Completeness, stability, and representativeness were higher for the laboratory system. • The sensitivity of the notif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of infectious diseases 2017-06, Vol.59 (C), p.141-147
Hauptverfasser: Benson, F.G, Musekiwa, A, Blumberg, L, Rispel, L.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Highlights • The South African laboratory and notification surveillance systems were compared. • For the three tracer diseases, fewer cases were notified than laboratory confirmed. • Completeness, stability, and representativeness were higher for the laboratory system. • The sensitivity of the notification system was low for one of the tracer diseases. • The positive predictive value of the notification system was acceptable for the three tracer diseases.
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2017.03.007