Evaluation of Wang-Koch optimisation of axial length for intraocular lens power calculation in myopic eyes
Background Refractive outcome has become more relevant in myopic patients. Refractive surprises are mainly caused by errors in axial length (AL) measurement.Aim This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in myopic eyes using the AL measured by optical biome...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African vision and eye health 2022, Vol.81 (1), p.e1-e6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Refractive outcome has become more relevant in myopic patients. Refractive surprises are mainly caused by errors in axial length (AL) measurement.Aim This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in myopic eyes using the AL measured by optical biometry versus an optimised AL calculated by the Wang-Koch method.Setting Ophthalmology Department, Cairo University and Ophthalmic Diagnostic and Laser Unit, Cairo University Hospitals, both in Cairo, Egypt.Methods A prospective study of 30 eyes of 23 patients with ALs greater than 25.0 mm that underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the capsular bag. The LENSTAR was used for preoperative IOL power calculation using the Holladay 1 formula and the LENSTAR AL (group 1), and for back-calculation of the prediction error (PE) for the same 30 eyes using the Holladay 1 formula and the optimised AL (group 2). Postoperative PEs and mean absolute errors (MAEs) were calculated six weeks after surgery.Results The postoperative spherical equivalent was within ± 1.00 dioptre (D) of predicted in 86.7% and 90.0% of eyes, respectively, (p = 0.69). However, 66.7% of eyes had a hyperopic outcome in group 1, in comparison to 20.0% that would be left hyperopic using the optimised AL in group 2 (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2413-3183 2410-1516 |
DOI: | 10.4102/aveh.v81i1.702 |