SHORTENING OF CLAVICLE FRACTURES: PHYSICAL VERSUS IMAGE EXAMINATIONS

SHORTENING OF CLAVICLE FRACTURES: PHYSICAL VERSUS IMAGE EXAMINATIONS

Determine the reliability of three different methods of evaluating bone shortening in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DCMF). A cross-sectional analytical study evaluated bone shortening by metric tape (MT), radiography (X-ray), and computed tomography (CT). Twenty-six men had been evaluated a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ortopedica brasileira 2024-01, Vol.32 (2), p.e274209
Hauptverfasser: Beraldo, Rodrigo Alves, Silva, Caroline Izidorio Bernardes, de Paiva, Hélio Henrique, Alexandre Galdeano, Ewerton, de Moraes, Renato
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Bone
Clavicle
Fractures
Original /Shoulder and Elbow
ORTHOPEDICS
Physical examination
Radiography
Tomography
X-Ray Computed
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Determine the reliability of three different methods of evaluating bone shortening in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DCMF). A cross-sectional analytical study evaluated bone shortening by metric tape (MT), radiography (X-ray), and computed tomography (CT). Twenty-six men had been evaluated and used clavícula not broken as control. The collection of data was of the blind type for three specialists. Differences and reliability were analyzed with the Friedman and Kappa tests and validated with the T-test (CI: 95%; significance index p
ISSN:1413-7852
1809-4406
1809-4406
DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243202e274209