The Comparison of the Effects of Two Botulinum Toxin A Injection Methods, Follow the Pain and Fixed-site Fixed-dose, on Improving the Quality of Life and Headaches in Patients with Chronic Migraine: A Preliminary Randomized Clinical Trial
Objective: Migraine headaches are one of the most common and debilitating diseases. Chronic migraine (CM) is a type of migraine that reduces quality of life and causes disability. Botulinum toxin A (BT-A) was approved in 2010 by the Food and Drug Administration for CM as one of the treatment options...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Türk nöroloji dergisi 2020-12, Vol.26 (4), p.269-276 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Migraine headaches are one of the most common and debilitating diseases. Chronic migraine (CM) is a type of migraine that reduces quality of life
and causes disability. Botulinum toxin A (BT-A) was approved in 2010 by the Food and Drug Administration for CM as one of the treatment options. In BT-A
treatment, follow the pain (FTP), fixed-site fixed-dose (FSFD) methods, and combined injections are prevalent. This clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of
two methods of BT-A injections in patients with CM to determine the method with the fewest complications, the strongest therapeutic effects, and the lowest
costs in improving quality of life.
Materials and Methods: In this preliminary clinical trial, 40 patients with CM were screened, and after examining the inclusion criteria, 18 patients
completed the trial. After a baseline examination and experiencing a 28-day baseline period, they were randomly divided into FSFD and FTP groups. In our study,
we used the Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Migraine Daily Note, and Headache Impact Test-6.
Results: A total of 17 women and 1 man completed the trial. Severity and rate of headaches and quality of life scores had better changes in the following months
with similar trends in both groups without a significant difference.
Conclusion: The comparison of the scores showed an improvement in most patients, but there was no significant difference between the FSFD and FTP groups.
However, the results indicated a greater response to the treatment and a higher rate of drug use in the FSFD group. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1301-062X 1309-2545 |
DOI: | 10.4274/tnd.2020.56767 |