Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostics (Basel) 2012-10, Vol.2 (4), p.42-51
Hauptverfasser: El Ali, Henrik H, Bodholdt, Rasmus Poul, Jørgensen, Jesper Tranekjær, Myschetzky, Rebecca, Kjaer, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was performed. Ten NMRI nude mice with subcutaneous implantation of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were scanned consecutively in small animal PET and CT scanners (MicroPET(TM) Focus 120 and ImTek's MicroCAT(TM) II). CT-based AC, PET-based AC and uniform AC methods were compared. The activity concentration in the same organ with and without AC revealed an overall attenuation recovery of 9-21% for MAP reconstructed images, i.e., SUV without AC could underestimate the true activity at this level. For subcutaneous tumors, the attenuation was 13 ± 4% (9-17%), for kidneys 20 ± 1% (19-21%), and for bladder 18 ± 3% (15-21%). The FBP reconstructed images showed almost the same attenuation levels as the MAP reconstructed images for all organs. The annihilation photons are suffering attenuation even in small subjects. Both PET-based and CT-based are adequate as AC methods. The amplitude of the AC recovery could be overestimated using the uniform map. Therefore, application of a global attenuation factor on PET data might not be accurate for attenuation correction.
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics2040042