Inconsistencies in Verlinde’s emergent gravity

A bstract We point out that recent Verlinde’s proposal of emergent gravity suffers from some internal inconsistencies. The main idea in this proposal is to preserve general relativity at short scales where numerous tests verified its validity, but modify it on large scales where we meet puzzles rais...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of high energy physics 2017-11, Vol.2017 (11), p.1-7, Article 7
Hauptverfasser: Dai, De-Chang, Stojkovic, Dejan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A bstract We point out that recent Verlinde’s proposal of emergent gravity suffers from some internal inconsistencies. The main idea in this proposal is to preserve general relativity at short scales where numerous tests verified its validity, but modify it on large scales where we meet puzzles raised by observations (in particular dark matter), by using some entropic concepts. We first point out that gravity as a conservative force is very difficult (if possible at all) to portray as an entropic force. We then show that the derivation of the MOND relation using the elastic strain idea is not self-consistent. When properly done, Verlinde’s elaborate procedure recovers the standard Newtonian gravity instead of MOND.
ISSN:1029-8479
1029-8479
DOI:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)007