Implementation of risk enhancers in ASCVD risk estimation and hypolipidemic treatment eligibility: A sex-specific analysis

Sex-specific data are limited regarding eligibility for hypolipidemic treatment. We aim to explore the sex-specific clinical utility of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and carotid ultrasound as risk modifiers for hypolipidemic treatment in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovasc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hellenic journal of cardiology 2023-09, Vol.73, p.16-23
Hauptverfasser: Georgiopoulos, Georgios, Delialis, Dimitrios, Aivalioti, Evmorfia, Georgakis, Vasileios, Mavraganis, Georgios, Angelidakis, Lasthenis, Bampatsias, Dimitrios, Armeni, Elena, Maneta, Eleni, Patras, Raphael, Dimopoulou, Maria Angeliki, Oikonomou, Ermioni, Kanakakis, Ioannis, Lambrinoudaki, Irene, Lagiou, Areti, Xenos, Panos, Stamatelopoulos, Kimon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sex-specific data are limited regarding eligibility for hypolipidemic treatment. We aim to explore the sex-specific clinical utility of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and carotid ultrasound as risk modifiers for hypolipidemic treatment in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to explore these sex-specific trends in two pooled contemporary independent Greek cohorts (Athens Vascular Registry n = 698, 50.9% women and Menopause Clinic n = 373, 100% women) of individuals without overt ASCVD. Baseline ASCVD risk was estimated using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) tools. The presence of carotid plaque and hsCRP ≥2 mg/L were integrated as risk modifiers. Men had increased odds to achieve target LDL-C levels based on ASCVD risk (23.8% vs. 17.7%, OR: 1.45 95% CI: 1.05–2.00, p = 0.023, for men vs. women). Additionally, considering carotid plaque or high hsCRP levels did not change this association but reduced on-target LDL-C rate in both sexes. Women had decreased odds of being eligible for hypolipidemic treatment by ASCVD risk estimation (11.5% vs. 26.4%, p 
ISSN:1109-9666
2241-5955
DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2023.02.006