Meta-analysis of the accuracy of the serum procalcitonin diagnostic test for osteomyelitis in children
This study sought to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive utility of serum procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnosis of pediatric osteomyelitis. A systematic computer-based search was conducted for eligible literature focusing on PCT for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children. Records...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2024-07, Vol.25 (1), p.578-10, Article 578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study sought to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive utility of serum procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnosis of pediatric osteomyelitis.
A systematic computer-based search was conducted for eligible literature focusing on PCT for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children. Records were manually screened according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager software 5.3, Meta-disc software1.4, STATA 12.0, and R 3.4 software.
A total of 5 investigations were included. Of these, 148 children with osteomyelitis were tested for bacterial cultures in PCT. For PCT in the diagnosis of pediatric osteomyelitis, diagnostic meta-analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49 to 0.68) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.93) respectively. The PCT had the greatest area under the curve (AUC) at 0.80 for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children. The Deeks' regression test for asymmetry results indicated that there was no publication bias when evaluating publication bias (P = 0.90).
This study provided a comprehensive review of the literature on the use of PCT in pediatric osteomyelitis diagnosis. PCT may be used as a biomarker for osteomyelitis diagnosis; however, its sensitivity was low. It still needs to be validated by a large sample study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-2474 1471-2474 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12891-024-07716-3 |