Comparative efficacy and safety of generic (Bergolak) vs. brand cabergoline in the treatment of patients with prolactin-secreting tumors

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cabergoline drug Bergolak («Veropharm», Russia) in the treatment of patients with prolactin-secreting tumors.Materials and methods: The study included 14 patients (14 women, mean age 46±12) diagnosed with prolactinoma. The patients were switched...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ozhirenie i metabolizm 2015-04, Vol.12 (1), p.40-44
Hauptverfasser: Melnichenko, Galina Afanas'evna, Dzeranova, Larisa Konstantinovna, Pigarova, Ekaterina Aleksandrovna, Vorotnikova, Svetlana Yur'evna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cabergoline drug Bergolak («Veropharm», Russia) in the treatment of patients with prolactin-secreting tumors.Materials and methods: The study included 14 patients (14 women, mean age 46±12) diagnosed with prolactinoma. The patients were switched to Bergolak after 1 month of treatment by original cabergoline. Dose of cabergoline varied from 0,125 mg to 3,25 mg per week. Prolactin level, symptoms of hyperprolactinemic hypogonadism, side-effects were evaluated at the baseline, after 1 month of original cabergoline treatment and 1 and 2 months of Bergolak therapy.Results: Statistical differences in the level of prolactin (p 0.05), and the incidence of side-effects (p 0.43) during Bergolak therapy in comparison with the original drug was not registered.Conclusions: Bergolak showed to be effective drug for  treatment of patients with prolactin-secreting tumors. The incidence of side-effects during Bergolak therapy is equal to the original cabergoline treatment.
ISSN:2071-8713
2306-5524
DOI:10.14341/omet2015140-44